Free Network Build Assessment
Take it freeNetwork builds succeed or fail based on strategy decisions made weeks before the submission deadline — which counties to prioritize, which providers to recruit first, how to scale a build across multiple states. These guides share the frameworks and tactics that work for health plan network teams managing complex, high-stakes builds.
Dual-eligible special needs plans have unique network requirements that sit at the intersection of Medicare and Medicaid standards. This playbook walks through a first-year D-SNP build from county selection to first submission.
A corrective action plan costs far more than staff time. Between regulatory scrutiny, re-filing fees, and delayed market entry, the real cost of a failed adequacy review can exceed $150,000. Here's how teams protect against it.
Not all counties are created equal. Some have abundant specialty providers; others are chronic adequacy gaps that require exception filings. A smart county selection strategy starts with adequacy modeling, not geography.
A CMS filing date doesn't move. Your build timeline has to be engineered backwards from that date, accounting for credentialing cycles, adequacy modeling time, and contracting lead times. Here's how to build the plan.
Rural counties are where network builds fail. Here are the strategies health plans use to meet adequacy when the provider supply is thin.
Failed adequacy reviews aren't the end — but how you respond in the next 30 days determines everything. Here's the playbook.
Provider network development drives every health plan's market entry and renewal strategy. This complete guide walks network development teams through the end-to-end build process — from county selection and HSD table planning to provider contracting and CMS submission.
Rural county Medicare Advantage network builds present provider supply constraints, access standard challenges, and waiver process complexities that urban builds do not. This playbook covers the strategies that work — and the common mistakes that waste time and budget.
Specialty provider shortages are the most common cause of Medicare Advantage network adequacy failures. Health plans that build systematic gap-filling strategies — rather than relying solely on direct contracting — achieve higher adequacy rates in more markets.
Federally Qualified Health Centers are among the most strategically important network partners for health plans serving Medicaid, Medicare Advantage, and Exchange populations. Understanding how FQHCs contribute to adequacy — and how to contract with them effectively — is essential for any plan building networks in underserved markets.
Building a compliant network is hard enough. Keeping it compliant year after year — as providers retire, close practices, or leave networks — is a separate operational challenge. Here are the retention strategies that high-performing network ops teams use.
Fee schedule strategy isn't just a finance question — it's a network adequacy question. The plans that build networks fastest are the ones whose fee schedules let recruiters make decisions quickly, without escalation. Here's how to structure your approach.
Launching a new Medicare Advantage or Medicaid managed care plan requires building a compliant provider network from scratch — often in 9-12 months. This guide covers the unique challenges of a first-year build and how to avoid the mistakes that cause new plan launches to fail adequacy review.
Not all specialties recruit at the same pace or price. A tiered contracting strategy lets you sequence outreach, allocate budget, and close the hardest providers before your filing window slams shut.
The technology you use for network build management will either compress your timeline or extend it. Here's a structured evaluation framework for health plan network teams selecting adequacy management software.
Contracted doesn't mean available. Panel management — tracking which providers are accepting new patients and keeping that data current — is one of the most underrated drivers of real-world network adequacy.
Hospital system contracting is the highest-stakes provider relationship in a network build. A single health system can provide — or block — dozens of specialty categories across multiple counties.
Independent Practice Association (IPA) contracts can simultaneously solve dozens of specialty gaps with a single agreement — or create single-point-of-failure network risk. Here's how to evaluate and structure IPA relationships in a network build.
Most plans manage network adequacy and Star Ratings as separate workstreams. But adequacy decisions — which providers are in network, how accessible they are — directly drive the member experience metrics that account for a third of your Star Rating.
Network builds are capital-intensive projects that most finance teams underbudget. Here's a cost framework covering staffing, technology, contracting incentives, and credentialing — with real benchmarks for MA, Medicaid, and Exchange builds.
Launching a new Medicare Advantage plan is the most network-intensive build scenario a health plan team can face. You're building from zero, with no existing relationships, against established competitors who've been contracting in your target counties for years.
Working backward from the HPMS bid submission deadline requires a detailed 12-month calendar. Here's how high-performing plans sequence provider recruitment, gap analysis, credentialing, and submission to avoid the late-filing risks that sink bids.
Building a network across 50+ counties simultaneously requires a disciplined sequencing strategy. Here's how leading plans prioritize counties, manage outreach coordination, and use Blueprint's county-level tracking to stay on top of a complex multi-market build.
Small and startup MA plans face network adequacy requirements identical to those applied to national carriers — with a fraction of the leverage, staff, and brand recognition. This guide covers the strategies that give new entrants a realistic path to compliant, functional networks.
Missing the network adequacy filing window doesn't just delay approval — it can invalidate a bid entirely. Here's how to map every CMS deadline to a concrete internal milestone so your build and your bid land together.