How is Blueprint different from Quest Analytics?

Quest Analytics is the market-leading network adequacy measurement platform — CMS uses it to review HSD submissions. Blueprint is different in scope: it combines a provider contracting CRM, real-time adequacy scoring, credentialing tracking, and HSD output in one platform. Quest tells you where the gaps are; Blueprint also runs the workflow to recruit and contract the providers who close them.

How is Blueprint different from Salesforce for network builds?

Salesforce Health Cloud is a strong, customizable CRM for provider contracting, but it has no native county × specialty adequacy scoring or CMS HSD-formatted output — you build or integrate that yourself over a months-long configuration. Blueprint is purpose-built for network builds with adequacy scoring integrated into the pipeline on day one.

Why is Blueprint better than tracking a network build in spreadsheets?

Spreadsheets have no geospatial adequacy engine, no real-time gap detection, weak version control, and no audit trail, so gaps surface late. Blueprint scores adequacy in real time against CMS HSD standards as providers move through the pipeline, surfacing critical specialty gaps weeks earlier.

Honest comparison

How Blueprint compares

Today, network teams stitch together a spreadsheet, a generic CRM, and a separate adequacy tool. Blueprint is the one platform that ties contracting, live adequacy, and submission into a single workflow — here's the honest, capability-by-capability picture.

Capability	Blueprint	Spreadsheets	Salesforce	Quest Analytics	Other Adequacy / PNM
Purpose-built for network builds			general PNM	measurement	Andros
Provider contracting pipeline (CRM)		manual
Real-time adequacy scoring				category leader
County × specialty gap analysis
CMS HSD-formatted output				CMS standard
Outreach automation
Credentialing tracking		manual			CVO
Integrated in one platform
Fast implementation (days)		instant, fragile
Transparent, published pricing		~free	quote-only	quote-only	quote-only
Done-for-you build (partner network)	partner intro				services-led

Full Partial Add-on None

Comparison reflects publicly available information as of June 2026; competitor capabilities are drawn from each vendor's own published materials. “Other Adequacy / PNM” blends provider-network-management and credentialing platforms (e.g., Andros, symplr). Blueprint is not affiliated with these companies.

Where Blueprint wins

One integrated platform. No incumbent unites a contracting CRM, real-time adequacy scoring, gap-to-recruitment workflow, and HSD output in one self-serve tool. Quest measures but doesn't contract; Salesforce contracts but doesn't score adequacy.
Purpose-built for the build. Designed around the analyst's daily loop — see the gap, target providers, contract them, re-score — not a generic CRM retrofit or a measurement tool with recruiting bolted on.
Speed and transparent pricing. Live in days, with pricing published on the site — in a market where the alternatives are quote-only with multi-month implementations.
Help when you need it. Run the software yourself, or we'll connect you with a trusted Blueprint partner who can run the build for you.

Where incumbents are strong

Quest Analytics has unmatched adequacy-measurement depth and the deepest regulatory pedigree — CMS uses it to review HSD submissions. For bulletproof CMS-grade measurement at scale, it's the established standard.
Salesforce offers enterprise scale, security, and limitless customization for organizations that want to build everything their own way.
symplr / Andros bring deep credentialing and CVO capability with large installed bases.

Blueprint isn't trying to out-measure Quest or out-credential symplr. It's the integrated build cockpit that ties contracting, live adequacy, and submission into one fast, transparently priced workflow.

The landscape, vendor by vendor

What each option is genuinely good at — and where it leaves gaps.

Spreadsheets / Excel

The default for many smaller plans — provider targets and contract status tracked in tabs and columns.

Strength: Free, flexible, no procurement.

Gap vs. Blueprint: No geospatial adequacy engine, no real-time gap detection, weak version control, no audit trail. Gaps surface too late — in 2023, 243 of 375 federal exchange plans failed directory/adequacy standards, partly from manual processes.

Salesforce Health Cloud

A configurable CRM/PNM platform for recruiting, contracting, and onboarding providers.

Strength: Enterprise-grade, deeply customizable, strong contracting workflow and outreach.

Gap vs. Blueprint: No native county × specialty adequacy scoring or CMS HSD output — you build or integrate that yourself, on top of a months-long configuration and quote-only pricing.

Quest Analytics

The market-leading network adequacy measurement platform — CMS itself uses Quest to review plans' HSD tables.

Strength: Unmatched adequacy-measurement depth, regulatory pedigree, scale, and accuracy. The gold standard for the measurement and submission step.

Gap vs. Blueprint: It measures — it doesn't run the build. No contracting pipeline, outreach, or credentialing: it tells you where the gaps are, not a workflow to recruit and contract the providers who close them.

Andros / symplr (PNM & credentialing)

Provider network management and credentialing platforms — Andros spans contracting + adequacy + CVO; symplr leads credentialing.

Strength: Genuinely integrate parts of the lifecycle; deep credentialing and large installed bases.

Gap vs. Blueprint: Heavier, services-led, enterprise-oriented and quote-only — less likely to be self-serve, fast, or transparently priced for a focused team.

See the difference on your own build

A 30-minute demo on real provider data for your state — pipeline, live adequacy, and HSD output in one place. No slides.

Schedule a Demo See Pricing